What Are The Ozone Generation Methods?

Ozone Generation

Ozone Generation Methods

When discussing ozone generation methods, there are three primary techniques used to produce ozone, each with its specific applications and advantages:

  1. Dielectric Barrier Discharge (Corona Discharge): This is the most widely used method for ozone generation. It involves applying a high voltage across electrodes, creating energetic oxygen atoms which then form ozone. Oxygen-fed ozone generators are particularly reliable and produce a high concentration of ozone, which is more easily dissolved in water.

  2. UV Radiation: UV lamps emit light that breaks the bond of oxygen molecules, resulting in the formation of ozone. This method produces minimal NOx and the UV light also disinfects the air, although it generally has a lower output and is less effective in dissolving in water.

  3. Electrolytic Ozone Generation: This process produces ozone directly in water using a DC voltage across electrodes in an electrolyte solution. It’s suited for high purity water and produces no NOx. However, the electrodes and proton exchange membranes (PEM) are prone to contamination.

Each method has its unique set of pros and cons, such as cost, output control, and efficiency in various humidity levels or water purities. The selection of an appropriate ozone generation method is critical and should be tailored to the specific needs of the application.

ozone generation
Image by ozonesolutions.com

PROS & CONS

1. Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) or Corona Discharge: This method is favored for its versatility and efficiency. The DBD method involves creating a high-voltage electrical discharge between two electrodes separated by an insulating dielectric barrier and a gas gap through which oxygen (either from the air or pure oxygen) flows. The electrical discharge causes the oxygen molecules to split into individual atoms which then recombine with other oxygen molecules to form ozone. Here are some additional details:

  • Pros:

    • Wide range of outputs, making it suitable for applications from small scale to industrial.
    • High ozone concentrations can be achieved, especially with oxygen-fed systems.
    • The output concentration can be controlled, which is critical for different applications.
  • Cons:

    • Air-fed systems may produce nitrogen oxides (NOx) which can lead to the formation of nitric acid, especially if there’s moisture present.
    • Large systems can be expensive to set up and maintain.
    • The performance of air-fed units can be affected by humidity, requiring dry air for optimal operation.

2. UV Radiation: UV ozone generation works on the principle that oxygen molecules (O2) can be split into individual oxygen atoms (O) by UV light at 185 nanometers (nm). These atoms can then combine with other oxygen molecules to form ozone (O3). This method is simpler and usually used for smaller-scale applications:

  • Pros:

    • It produces very little to no nitrogen oxides (NOx).
    • The construction of UV ozone generators is simpler compared to corona discharge systems.
    • UV light also provides additional disinfection benefits.
    • UV-based systems can be combined with photocatalysts to reduce volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
  • Cons:

    • They have a relatively low ozone output and the concentration is often lower than what can be achieved with corona discharge.
    • The efficiency of dissolving the produced ozone into water is lower due to the lower concentration.
    • There is typically a lack of output control, making it less versatile for varying demands.
    • The disposal of mercury bulbs, which are hazardous, must be handled with care.

3. Electrolytic Ozone Generation: Electrolytic ozone generators produce ozone by passing a direct current (DC) through water containing dissolved electrolytes. The electrical current causes water molecules to split, producing ozone along with hydrogen and oxygen gases. This method is used in applications where ozone is needed directly in water:

  • Pros:

    • Ozone is produced directly in the water, eliminating the need for additional mixing or dissolution equipment.
    • Pure ozone generation without the production of NOx.
  • Cons:

    • The system requires high-purity water and is generally only suited for small-scale applications or low flows.
    • The process can produce hydrogen gas, which may require additional safety considerations.
    • Electrodes and proton exchange membranes (PEM) can be contaminated, which may reduce efficiency and increase maintenance requirements.

Selecting the right ozone generation technology depends on various factors, including the required ozone concentration, the scale of the application, and the specific requirements of the process. Each method has its trade-offs, and the ideal choice would be the one that aligns best with the operational needs and desired outcomes.

In industrial applications, the corona discharge method is often preferred due to its scalability and the higher concentrations of ozone it can produce. For smaller-scale or specific applications where additional air treatment is beneficial, UV ozone generation might be more appropriate. Electrolytic ozone generation finds its niche in specialized applications requiring ozone to be generated directly in the water.

Request Information

Contact us to get information about our solutions, application details and price information.