fbpx
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter

STUDY: SARS-CoV-2 Aerosol Transmission In Schools

The Effectiveness of Different Interventions

Indoor aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has been widely recognized, especially in schools where children remain in close proximity and largely unvaccinated. Measures such as strategic natural ventilation and high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration remain poorly implemented and mask mandates are often progressively lifted as vaccination rollout is enhanced.

We adapted a previously developed aerosol transmission model to study the effect of interventions (natural ventilation, face masks, HEPA filtration, and their combinations) on the concentration of virus particles in a classroom of 160 m3 containing one infectious individual. The cumulative dose of viruses absorbed by exposed occupants was calculated.

The most effective single intervention was natural ventilation through the full opening of six windows all day during the winter (14-fold decrease in cumulative dose), The universal use of surgical face masks (8-fold decrease).

In the spring/summer, natural ventilation was only effective (≥ 2-fold decrease) when windows were fully open all day. In the winter, partly opening two windows all day or fully opening six windows at the end of each class was effective as well (≥ 2-fold decrease). Opening windows during yard and lunch breaks only had a minimal effect (≤ 1.2-fold decrease).

One HEPA filter was as effective as two windows partly open all day during the winter (2.5-fold decrease) while two filters were more effective (4-fold decrease). Combined interventions (i.e., natural ventilation, masks, and HEPA filtration) were the most effective (≥ 30-fold decrease). Combined interventions remained highly effective in the presence of a super-spreader.

Natural ventilation, face masks, and HEPA filtration are effective interventions to reduce SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission. These measures should be combined and complemented by additional interventions (e.g., physical distancing, hygiene, testing, contact tracing, and vaccination) to maximize benefit.

Source:
SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission in schools: the effectiveness of different interventions.
Jennifer VillersAndre Henriques, Serafina CalarcoMarkus RognlienNicolas MounetJames DevineGabriella AzzopardiPhilip ElsonMarco AndreiniNicola TaroccoClaudia VassellaOlivia Keiser

Air Purifiers to Improve
Indoor Air Quality

Air purifiers provide a significant benefit, along with proper ventilation, to improve air quality and eliminate polluting factors. Today, air-cleaning devices developed with state-of-the-art filtration systems filter viruses, bacteria and microorganisms with HEPA filters and then purify the indoor air with air purification technologies such as UV and Ioniser. Even in devices with the best filtration system, HEPA filters need to be changed every 1-3 months.

These devices filter or neutralize pollutants such as viruses, bacteria, pollen, particles, etc. in the air. They do not affect increasing the amount of oxygen in the air. If possible, the CO2 values ​​in the classrooms should be measured continuously and fresh air intake should be provided to the classrooms.

Don't forget to share this post!

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on whatsapp

Related Posts

It is hard to overstate how important air purifiers are for classrooms, especially going forward. They’re one of the places that are most in need of them

Share on linkedin LinkedIn Share on facebook Facebook Share on twitter Twitter FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT GERMICIDAL UV UV BACKGROUND The 2014 …

Share on linkedin LinkedIn Share on facebook Facebook Share on twitter Twitter STUDY: SARS-CoV-2 Aerosol Transmission In Schools The Effectiveness of Different …

Share on linkedin LinkedIn Share on facebook Facebook Share on twitter Twitter What is CADR (CLEAN AIR DELIVERY RATE)? Air purifiers are …